|
MEETING THE ENEMY IN THE MIRROR
Back in 1970, Walt
Kelly’s comic character “Pogo” introduced the now famous quote – “We
have met the enemy and he is us.” 35 years later, we ought to be
thinking the same way about access to personal information over the
Internet.
In the early days of
Internet froth, the Social Security Division of the Federal government
provided a full financial history to anyone who entered a social
security number online. Maybe you entered your own. Maybe someone else
entered a lot of other people’s social security numbers. All revealed
the same wealth of personal information. A year later, that capability
was shut down.
Yet today it’s not
terribly difficult to find scanned images of mortgage documents over the
Internet. Just look at town clerk web sites throughout the country and
you’ll be able to download loan document images, find social security
numbers, work histories, previous residences, incomes sources,
investments and more.
Lest we lean back
smugly in our office chairs, think of the last board packet your
institution emailed to its directors. Most likely it consisted of text
and spreadsheet files. Most likely this information was not encrypted or
password protected in any way. How many mortgage papers were in those
files? How many employee names? How much confidential information about
your institution’s financial health?
We could cite
example after example of lapses in our collective security of personal
information, but the point is this: if we really believe that we must
protect personal information from disclosure over the Internet, we need
to attack the problem far more aggressively.
Five years ago, the
financial industry breathed a sigh of relief at the passing of Y2K. We
had survived a year plus effort to catalog all the systems and programs
vulnerable to date problems once the year rolled from 99 to 00. We need
the same effort to stop the disclosure of personal information over the
Internet.
This won’t be as
tough on the financial industry as it will be for unregulated businesses
and individuals. Banks and credit unions already have a security focus
and the annual examination process grows tighter every year.
The biggest black
hole in securing personal information lies in the policies and practices
of our unregulated brethren who justify their weaknesses with claims of
ignorance, thoughtlessness or just plain stupidity. While the excuses
rain down like crocodile tears, the risk of fraud is rising.
To regain control of
the situation, we need to:
-
Take security
breaches seriously. There is no rug to sweep breaches under.
Prevention and containment need to be active management programs
that are understood by all employees.
-
Relentless
pursuit of security. Just as we dig for operational efficiencies and
expense control, we need to dig for opportunities to increase
security. Criminal minds never stop trying to break the system. We
can’t afford to stop anticipating the next criminal exploit.
-
Enlist customers
in the security effort. Customers are excellent canaries in our
information mineshafts for phishing and other spam-based exploits.
At the same time, customers are also the unregulated folks who allow
exploits to flourish by opening infected emails and not patching
their PCs. By encouraging safe security practices at our customers’
sites, we help the banking industry by restricting opportunities for
fraud.
We can
be our own best enemies as well as our own best friends, and ignoring
either possibility increases our vulnerability. Said differently, if we
ignore our capacity for error, we miss opportunities that fraudsters
will eventually exploit. If we ignore our strengths, we eliminate
resources that can prevent and contain an attack.
We’ve
cited “take aways” in Pogo as well as Y2K. But another event speaks to
our potential for breach – September 11, 2001. Until that date, America
regarded terrorism as something that happened in far away lands. Our
border security was lax. Our airport security was lax. Our Internet
security was lax. After September 11, we began to understand our
vulnerability.
Knowing what we know now, we need to ask ourselves one question when we
look in the mirror: Do we see an ally or an enemy in the war against
security breaches and fraud?
|